Question

第三節(jié)：書面表達(dá)（滿分15分）

         最近，關(guān)于“中國(guó)高中是否應(yīng)該取消文理分科”的網(wǎng)上調(diào)查吸引了許多網(wǎng)民的積極參與。請(qǐng)你根據(jù)下表所給的信寫一封英文信，描述被調(diào)查者的不同看法和表明你（李華）的看法，并將信發(fā)給對(duì)此感興趣的美國(guó)筆友Tom。

         注意：詞數(shù)100左右，文章開頭已給出，不計(jì)入總詞數(shù)。

         網(wǎng)民：netizens；課程：curriculum；文理科：arts and science。

Dear Tom,

         Recently many netizens have taken part in the survey about whether the curriculum of senior high school should be divided into arts and science in China.

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

Yours,

Li Hua

Answer 1

 One possible version:

Dear Tom,

         Recently many netizens have taken part in the survey about whether the curriculum of senior high school should be divided into arts and science in China．

         About 46% of the netizens are in support of the idea that the curriculum should be divided into arts and science．Otherwise, students may have too much to learn, which increases their burden greatly．However, about 54% of them hold the opposite view．They believe that it is not good for students' full development and that they may have a narrow knowledge．

         In my opinion, the problem does not lie in whether the curriculum should be divided or not．Actually most students spend their time and energy mainly on either arts or science, which may have a bad effect on their development．So I would like to suggest that the college entrance examination in China should be reformed．

         Look forward to your reply!

Yours,

Li Hua